Analisis Bibliometrik In Find Research Gap Bidang Ilmu Keperawatan Menggunakan Aplikasi Publish or Perish dan Vosviewer di Indonesia

Authors

  • Thamrin Hasan Universitas Riau
  • Yurnalis Perpustakaan Cabang Fakultas Pertanian Universitas Riau, Pekanbaru-Riau, Indonesia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.31258/jgp.12.1.33-48

Keywords:

bibliometric analysis, gap, PoP, incident, vosviewer

Abstract

This research aims to analyze current research trends in the field of homicide in Indonesia, identify the most studied research topics, and find research gaps that can be studied further. This research uses a bibliometric method with data from Google Scholar for the 2018-2022 period which was harvested via the Publish or Perish application. Bibliometric analysis was carried out based on six characteristics: (1) article publication trends, (2) journals that published the most articles, (3) most cited articles, (4) frequently used keywords, (5) most frequently used author's institutions productive, and (6) visualization of analysis results using VOSviewer. The research results show: 1) Journal of Mental Nursing Science is the most active journal related to research in the field of poisoning in Indonesia in 2018-2022. 2) Kedal College of Health Sciences (STIKES) is the most active research institution with many articles cited. 3) Livana, P.H. the most active author and contributed greatly to homicide research. 4) The most cited article is the result of Anung Ahadi Pradana's research. 5) Research topics that are widely discussed include maintenance, workload, critical thinking, fatigue, caring, intervention, leadership, job satisfaction, patient satisfaction, nurse performance, service quality, training, care services, nurse experience, and nurse knowledge . 6) Research topics that are gaps and have the potential for further research include the role of the family, relaxation, schizophrenia, violence, hemodialysis, self-efficacy, stroke, breast milk production, adolescent sexual behavior, anxiety, depression, self-concept, obesity, and contraception. It can be concluded that this research succeeded in finding research gaps in the field of bleeding in Indonesia can be used as a reference for further research.

References

Arikunto. H. (2016). Prosedur Penelitian: Suatu Pendekatan Praktik. Jakarta: Rineka Cipta.

Babb, B. A., & Pruett, M. K. (2022). January 2022. Family Court Review, 60(1), 5–6. https://doi.org/10.1111/fcre.12621

Creswell, J. W. (2014). Research Design: Qualitative, Quantitative, and Mixed Methods Approaches. Sage Publications.

Ilmu Bersama. (2022). Publish or Peris. https://ilmubersama.com/2022/11/21/publish-or-perish/

Karim, A. Et al. (2021). Analisis Bibliometrik Menggunakan Vosviewer Terhadap Trend Riset Matematika Terapan di Google Scholar. Jurnal Riset Pendidikan Matematika Jakarta (JRPMJ). 3(2), 23-33. https://doi.org/10.21009/jrpmj.v3i2.22264

Kerlinger, F. N. & Lee, H. B. (2020). Foundations of Behavioral Research. Wadsworth Publishing Company.

Matos, S., & Rossi, M. (2016). Mapping the research on public sector innovation: A bibliometric analysis. Public Management Review, 18(1), 45-66. https://doi.org/10.1080/14719037.2014.929489.

Nova, E., Patty, S., Iriyani, S. A., Refitaningsih, R., Ria, P., Ardiyati, S. M., & Bumigora, U. (2023). Analisis Bibliometrik Kinerja Dosen Penelitian Menggunakan Aplikasi Vosviewer. April, 41–51. https://doi.org/10.47709/educendikia.v3i1.2238

Plonsky, L., & Oswald, F. L. (2014). How big is “big”? Interpreting effect sizes in L2 research. Language Learning, 64(s1), 878-912. https://doi.org/10.1111/lang.12079.

Price, D. J. (1963). Little science, big science... and beyond. Columbia University Press.

Pritchard, A. (1969). Statistical bibliography or bibliometrics?. Journal of Documentation. 25(4), 348-349.

Rohanda, R., Winoto, Y., & Analisis Bibliometrika Tingkat Kolaborasi, P. P. (2019). Serta Profil Artikel Jurnal Kajian Informasi & Perpustakaan Tahun 2014-2018, Pustabiblia. Journal of Library and Information Science, 3(1), 1-15. https://doi.org/10.18326/pustabiblia.v3i1.1-16

Robinson, K.A., I.J. Saldanha, dan N.A. Mckoy. (2016). “Development of a Framework to Identify Research Gaps from Systematic Reviews”. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology. 64(12), 1325-1330.

Sari, M. I., Hidayat, A. A., & Rohmah, A. (2021). Bibliometric analysis of nursing research in Indonesia (2011–2020) using Publish or Perish. Enfermería Clínica, 31, 297-300. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enfcli.2021.02.008

Shekhawat, K., & Rathore, A. S. (2018). Research Gap: A Diagnostic Study. Journal of Arts, Science & Commerce, 9(2), 1-8.

Sholeha, A.W. (2023). VosViewer, Pengertian dan Langkah-langkah penggunaan. Diakses: 15 April 2023, From: https://ebizmark.id/artikel/vos-viewer-pengertian-dan-langkah-langkah-

Utami, S. W., Nihayati, H. E., & Pratiwi, I. G. A. M. (2019). Bibliometric analysis of nursing research in Indonesia. Enfermería Clínica, 29, 373-378. doi: 10.1016/j.enfcli.2019.05.056

Waltman, L., & van Eck, N. J. (2017). VOSviewer: A computer program for bibliometric mapping. Scientometrics, 84(2), 523-538.

Widuri, N. R., & Prasetyadi, A. (2018). Tingkat kolaborasi, produktivitas penulis dan artikel metrik pada Jurnal Mechatronics, Electrical Power, and Vehicular Technology. Berkala Ilmu Perpustakaan Dan Informasi, 14(1), 62-75. https://doi.org/10.22146/bip.33408

Yin, R. K. (2014). Case study research: Design and methods (5th ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

Published

2024-06-30

Issue

Section

Articles

Most read articles by the same author(s)

1 2 > >>